Titicut Follies

Description:
Lawyer-turned-filmmaker Frederick Wiseman’s foray into documentary auteurism came with Titicut Follies (1967), a cogent profile of Massachusetts’ Bridgewater State Hospital for the criminally insane. The film’s namesake is an ambiguously demeaning and chilling talent show put on by inmates—“Titicut” being the Wampanoag word for the nearby Taunton River. This was four years after John F. Kennedy signed the Community Mental Health Centers Act, which infused the system with 150 million dollars. Nevertheless, Wiseman captures a Bridgewater that is a microcosm of the horrors still alive in mental hospitals (it would not be until the 1970s that the number of individuals in such institutions was reduced from a half million in the 1950s to 160,000.) Omitting a narrator, Wiseman records and layers sound with a ghostly sparseness. Meanwhile, John Marshall’s unwavering camerawork and Wiseman’s methodical, hundred-hour editing process guides our eyes through the cells, halls, and yards of these forgotten people’s lives. Old, young, lucid, catatonic—the staff does not differentiate. It is this impersonal, mass grouping, representative of the state of the system at the time (and still perhaps today), that really exceeds our capacity to understand, especially when witnessing travesties like force-feeding. Wiseman’s booming sensitivity translates with his ability to capture many faces and voices, while also allowing ample screen time for each individual to demonstrate their humanity. There is much to glean from this breakthrough piece of direct cinema, but the loudest message is that when society turns its back on a people, we are all responsible for bringing awareness and kindness to that population.

Continue reading

La Marche des Machines / Les Nuits Eléctriques / Montparnasse

Description:
Born out of the Czech and French avant-garde movements of the ’20s, Eugène Deslaw’s silent documentaries all share a certain meditative drift to their montage, at once emphasizing strong and abstract rhythms in photography that make for almost hypnotically smooth and fascinating transitions. His second film, La Marche des Machines (March of the Machines), suggests a Futurist-influenced appreciation of the kinetic perfection inherent in mechanical automation. The film also allows space for static shots that break patterns of movement and begin to suggest their own through composition. Les Nuits Eléctriques (Electric Nights) is a trancelike study of city lighting in Paris, London, Berlin and Prague by night, concentrating on luminous signage. Having said “I think the modern night…is as photogenic if not more than a beautiful woman’s face,” Deslaw formed this piece with the same romance and mystique that his words suggest. Now on to Montparnasse, which captures the hilly, starving-artist district of Paris. This work distinguishes itself from the former two in that people and animals become primary focuses, inspiring the camera to take on more of a shaky, personal quality to complement the chaotic movement of the subjects. A master’s eye is clearly at work, marked by certain flat perspectives and a use of natural lighting, both of which are reminiscent of the photography of Paul Strand. Deslaw also utilizes long telephoto detail shots of things like street signs and ponds, which bear a resemblance to contemporary Joris Ivens. Deslaw retains the same patient pacing in this work as seen previously, allowing for the anarchy of movement to be disrupted and reconsidered based on the flow of rhythm and shape.

Continue reading

Martyrs of Love

Description:
Jan Nemec’s now-rarely seen and largely-unavailable film, Martyrs of Love, made in 1966. The three stories that make up the film are about loners in search of love, with often ironic results. Two of Czechoslovakia’s star singers, Marta Kubisova and Karel Gott, appear in minor roles and supply songs. Though this version has no subtitles, there is almost no dialog.

Continue reading

L’hippocampe (The Seahorse)

Description:
Forever an advocate of the superiority of nature over the artifice of film – a reaction to the strict aesthetic formulae being preached by Eisenstein, Bazin, and Griffith — Jean Painlevé’s oeuvre can only be classified as a genre unto itself: scientific-poetic cinema. In explaining the lifecycle of the seahorse, Painlevé narration imbues his subjects with personality, character, and a sense of humor. His tendency to anthropomorphize rendered the material infinitely more approachable, which explains the success of his films in a category that’s infamous for having a sleep-inducing effect on students. Without relying on trick photography or unnecessary camera manipulation, L’hippocampe captures the surreal almost mystical attributes of its photogenic subjects, presenting them as abstract entities worthy of their own kind of aesthetic contemplation. This methodology endows the sequence of images with a tactile plasticity, reminiscent of puppet theatres and dioramas. This transforms the screen into a veritable window against which we long to press our faces, as if at an aquarium. It was this insight – that we find reality, as mediated by the camera, to be as entrancing as fiction – that led Painlevé to the radical distillation of his philosophy: “science is fiction.”
Continue reading

Andy Warhol Eating a Hamburger

Description:
Andy Warhol’s film Andy Warhol Eating a Hamburger is riddled with equally amusing and perplexing intricacies. After taking apart his hamburger, in preparation for consumption, he puts the ketchup to the side of the foil, rather than on top of the open-faced bun as expected. At another moment, Andy breaks from his otherwise consistent expression of apathy, suppressing a smirk as he struggles to dole out ketchup. “It won’t come out,” he says, perhaps amused at the cleverness of his own project. Having disposed of his half-finished burger, Warhol contends himself to staring blankly off screen, his eyes occasionally flitting past the camera. We get the sense that he’s waiting for something, although it’s unclear what. He opens his mouth, only to close it again. As the viewer becomes increasingly agitated in a state of bewildered suspense, the film builds to an irresolute climax, with Warhol’s proclamation: “My name is Andy Warhol and I just ate a hamburger.”

Continue reading